Asus GRYPHON Z87

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus GRYPHON Z87  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140815
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateDec 09 '20 at 03:52
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 90.2
1-Core 106
2-Core 210
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 407
55% 408 Pts
64-Core 408
25% 408 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
EVGA(3842 6583) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 149
Parallax 136
111% 140 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 142
Splatting 124
105% 128 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
779GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 381 438 455 455 416 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 191
Mixed 304
SusWrite 402
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 48.1
173% 64.8 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 342
261% 354 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 113%
Great: 133%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
541GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 105 112 113 110 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 142
Write 132
Mixed 77
SusWrite 110
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
204% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 112%
Samsung SSD 860 EVO 1TB
331GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 184 197 199 199 200 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 382
Write 385
Mixed 358
SusWrite 187
437% 328 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 25.6
4K Mixed 24.8
1,807% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 27
DQ Write 36.6
DQ Mixed 30.7
2,389% 31.4 MB/s
Poor: 91%
This bench: 181%
Great: 227%
Samsung SSD 860 EVO 1TB
444GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 17 3 1.4 1.2 0.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 379
Write 386
Mixed 367
SusWrite 9.5
369% 285 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 25.5
4K Mixed 24
1,770% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 25.4
DQ Write 36.6
DQ Mixed 29.6
2,346% 30.5 MB/s
Poor: 91%
This bench: 141%
Great: 227%
Samsung SSD 860 EVO 1TB
368GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 188 198 199 199 201 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 378
Write 385
Mixed 358
SusWrite 189
437% 327 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 25.5
4K Mixed 25.1
1,812% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 27
DQ Write 37.3
DQ Mixed 30.7
2,413% 31.7 MB/s
Poor: 91%
This bench: 180%
Great: 227%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
60.4% Good
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 18.7
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 18.9
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GRYPHON Z87 Builds (Compare 654 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus GRYPHON Z87 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $620
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback