Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GD_X571GD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GD_X571GD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X571GD
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200520
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateDec 08 '20 at 23:35
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 92
1-Core 126
2-Core 236
86% 151 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 610
63% 506 Pts
64-Core 676
42% 676 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 12FF) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6617
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.03% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 32.1
Parallax 7.2
5% 15.3 fps
MRender 10
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 10.6
8% 8.93 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.03%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$58
324GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 915 908 889 308 93 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1234
Write 770
Mixed 812
SusWrite 528
186% 836 MB/s
4K Read 52.7
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 66.9
233% 82.6 MB/s
DQ Read 331
DQ Write 699
DQ Mixed 221
252% 417 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 177%
Great: 209%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5700-014.A00G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
74.8% Very good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 21.6
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 27.9
SC Mixed 22.2
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GD_X571GD Builds (Compare 319 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GD_X571GD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $58
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback