Asus M51AC

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus M51AC (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M51AC
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20130927
Uptime	2.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 08 '20 at 14:50
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570-$99 129,272 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77.6% Very good	Memory 88.4 1-Core 98.5 2-Core 200 74% 129 Pts	4-Core 389 8-Core 378 52% 383 Pts	64-Core 377 23% 377 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 3351) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.51 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	33.7% Below average	Lighting 43.9 Reflection 43 Parallax 40.8 36% 42.6 fps	MRender 38.6 Gravity 44 Splatting 29 30% 37.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF2204RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 106 35 26 25 29 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	42.9% Average	Read 427 Write 366 Mixed 229 SusWrite 68 60% 272 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 40.8 4K Mixed 8.4 62% 23 MB/s	DQ Read 72.5 DQ Write 97.4 DQ Mixed 12.8 30% 60.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 56%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 390GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 119 118 119 102 107 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	67% Good	Read 121 Write 132 Mixed 31 SusWrite 113 72% 99 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ASU16D3LU1KBG/8G 1x8GB 1,209 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	33.2% Below average	MC Read 10.9 MC Write 11.6 MC Mixed 9.5 30% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 9.8 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 69.1 58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M51AC Builds (Compare 633 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Asus M51AC

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	390x
Core i7-4770SIntel $112Bench 71%, 13,157 samples	125x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	33x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	43x
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	41x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	36x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $88Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	15x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	15x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x

RAM
MI64C1D1629Z1 2x8GBAdataBench 54%, 2,816 samples	79x
MI64C1D1629Z1 1x8GBAdataBench 31%, 1,606 samples	36x
AO2L16BC8R2-BR2S 2x8GBUnknownBench 56%, 671 samples	36x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $222

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16