QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics86.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '20 at 08:54
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User NCL-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Core (Skylake)
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 135
2-Core 262
87% 159 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 269
36% 268 Pts
64-Core 263
16% 263 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
EVGA(3842 2061) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.22
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86.3% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 103
Parallax 104
87% 105 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 97.9
Splatting 89.1
85% 107 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 166GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 5,934
Write 3,901
Mixed 4,522
1,061% 4,786 MB/s
4K Read 125
4K Write 79
4K Mixed 95.5
354% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 831
DQ Write 681
DQ Mixed 777
576% 763 MB/s
Red Hat VirtIO 256GB
127GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 198 198 175 193 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
65% Good
Read 316
Write 244
Mixed 204
SusWrite 191
54% 239 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 19.8
96% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 318
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 210
174% 253 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65%
Great: 76%
Red Hat VirtIO 1TB
130GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 80 80 80 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 123
Write 118
Mixed 56.7
SusWrite 80.1
69% 94.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 38.6
MC Mixed 34.3
97% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 39.7
SC Mixed 27.6
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback