Asrock 970 Performance

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive90.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Performance  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150319
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 11 '17 at 01:41
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 78.2
2-Core 152
61% 103 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 471
47% 381 Pts
64-Core 470
29% 470 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520
Zotac(19DA 1222) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 266 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 347.52
Relative performance n/a - GPU benchmark error
Poor: 2% Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 401
Write 422
Mixed 424
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 95.9
4K Mixed 25.5
122% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 295
DQ Write 245
DQ Mixed 71.3
108% 204 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 101%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30
635GB free
Firmware: ST6O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 102
Write 98.2
Mixed 92.3
73% 97.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.71
4K Mixed 0.46
109% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 61%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
316GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 123
Write 124
Mixed 4.64
60% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.86
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.19
88% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 108%
Toshiba MK6034GSX 60GB
7GB free
Firmware: AH10 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 17.5
Write 22.5
Mixed 20.3
15% 20.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.02
4K Mixed 0.25
66% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 19%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 128GB
42GB free, PID a838
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
30% Poor
Read 70.7
Write 76.9
Mixed 30.4
73% 59.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.62
4K Write 0.68
4K Mixed 0.57
56% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 30%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown IMT41GU6MFR8C-RA0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 400 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 5.4
16% 5.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.9
16% 5.53 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Performance Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Performance

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $311
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback