Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive63.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '17 at 22:55
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
66% Good
Memory 86.5
1-Core 69.1
2-Core 136
60% 97.3 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 425
41% 336 Pts
64-Core 430
27% 430 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI HD 4870
PwrHis(1787 2007) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.0
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Lighting 15.4
Reflection 13
Parallax 11.2
12% 13.2 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 11.2
Splatting 18.4
11% 13.2 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M5S 128GB-$75
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 459
Write 205
Mixed 280
69% 315 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 35.2
4K Mixed 22.7
78% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 66.5
81% 142 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 84%
WD WD1500HLFS-01G6U1 150GB
43GB free
Firmware: 04.04V05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 95
Write 81.1
Mixed 105
71% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 2.17
4K Mixed 0.58
133% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 68%
WL300GLSA1610000 300GB
14GB free
Firmware: 04.04V02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 78.7
Write 79
Mixed 78.5
59% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 2.12
4K Mixed 0.45
118% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 61%
WD Black 750GB (2008)-$140
4GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 93.7
Write 86.1
Mixed 87.3
67% 89 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 2.54
4K Mixed 0.51
138% 1.29 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMX4GX3M1A1333C9 Kingston 9905403-011.A03LF CMX4GX3M1A1333C9 Kingston 9905403-011.A03LF 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.6% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 15.3
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 13.3
32% 11 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,067 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $606
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback