Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive35.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '20 at 14:30
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT-$370
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Memory 68.5
1-Core 161
2-Core 320
96% 183 Pts
4-Core 623
8-Core 1,166
107% 894 Pts
64-Core 2,195
136% 2,195 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Asus(1043 86A5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.30
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 104
Reflection 102
Parallax 92.6
85% 99.6 fps
Gravity 94.8
Splatting 79.7
76% 87.2 fps
Poor: 70% Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier Pro SP900 128GB-$40
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.6.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 88 78 77 76 64 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.7% Below average
Read 250
Write 125
Mixed 157
SusWrite 77.9
34% 153 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 26.1
64% 16.8 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 80%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
25GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,505
Write 2,284
Mixed 1,572
471% 2,121 MB/s
4K Read 58.9
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 77
254% 86.6 MB/s
DQ Read 643
DQ Write 638
DQ Mixed 651
486% 644 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
11GB free
Firmware: CC3C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 75 77 78 77 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 78.5
Write 77.8
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 76.2
53% 71.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
120% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 75%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$39
6GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 92 84 75 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 68.1
Write 70.3
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 81.8
55% 74.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
167% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3600C18-16GTZR 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.6% Very good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 28.3
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 27.5
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO Builds (Compare 1,862 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 205%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 224%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $1,566
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback