HP EliteBook 850 G5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.76% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 850 G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 83B2
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201016
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 06 '20 at 10:32
Run Duration80 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 11%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 67.4
1-Core 123
2-Core 236
77% 142 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 610
66% 526 Pts
64-Core 596
37% 596 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
HP(103C 83B2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8935
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.76% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 13.8
Parallax 8.6
6% 9.9 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 11.6
8% 10 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.76%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA72H1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,104
Write 1,887
Mixed 1,309
392% 1,767 MB/s
4K Read 49.5
4K Write 92.8
4K Mixed 61.3
203% 67.9 MB/s
DQ Read 746
DQ Write 863
DQ Mixed 806
607% 805 MB/s
Poor: 123% Great: 295%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x9B85] CT16G4SFD824A.M16FE Hynix HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
77.9% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 24.8
80% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 32.5
SC Mixed 24
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 850 G5 Builds (Compare 967 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 850 G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback