Foxconn nT-i1000 Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 11% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Foxconn nT-i1000 Series (all builds)
Motherboard	Foxconn nT-i1000 Series
Memory	0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121130
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 06 '20 at 10:29
Run Duration	177 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	46%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom D2550 408 User benchmarks, average bench 25% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	26% Poor	Memory 48 1-Core 6.5 2-Core 13.9 19% 22.8 Pts	4-Core 26.3 8-Core 25.4 4% 25.8 Pts	64-Core 26.7 2% 26.7 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 29%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 3600 1,010 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Device(105B 0D7D) Driver: imghal64.dll Ver. 8.15.8.1050 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	0.75% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 1 Parallax 0.7 1% 1.03 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.75% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HTS543225L9A300 250GB-$30 4,341 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 218GB free (System drive) Firmware: FBEOC40C SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 20 19 22 33 36 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Read 21.9 Write 38.7 Mixed 6.3 SusWrite 23.1 16% 22.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 60% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 36%
USB DISK CD 2GB 2GB free, PID 3e27 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.2 2.9 4.9 4.9 4.8 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	3.68% Terrible	Read 14.8 Write 10.7 Mixed 9.7 SusWrite 4 12% 9.8 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 14% 0.97 MB/s

Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB 14,254 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 6.1 6.3 6.1 5.5 6.2 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	6.01% Terrible	Read 15.5 Write 4 Mixed 6 SusWrite 6 9% 7.88 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.7 54% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.01% Great: 7%
Adata DashDrive UV128 USB 3.0 16GB 2,489 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 11GB free, PID db8a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 39 40 36 37 42 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	19.1% Very poor	Read 58.2 Write 21 Mixed 12.5 SusWrite 39.8 39% 32.9 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.8 52% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend JM1066KSN-2G 1x2GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 1066 MHz Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.8% Very poor	MC Read 5.1 MC Write 4.1 MC Mixed 3.4 12% 4.2 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 3 9% 3.2 GB/s	Latency 168 24% 168 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 19%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical nT-i1000 Series Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 25%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Foxconn nT-i1000 Series

CPU
Atom D2550IntelBench 25%, 408 samples	1x

GPU
Corporation Atom? N2000/D2000 Series Embedded Media and Graphics DriverIntelBench 0%, 1 sample	1x

SSD
T253X1120G 120GBTeamBench 65%, 1,708 samples	1x

RAM
TN4G8C11-H11 1x4GBUnknownBench 13%, 9 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16