Asus H110M-A/M.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics44.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H110M-A/M.2  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160919
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 10 '17 at 03:10
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Memory 81.4
1-Core 106
2-Core 177
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 220
24% 190 Pts
64-Core 235
14% 235 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1230 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.3.3
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44.1% Average
Lighting 54
Reflection 62.3
Parallax 73.7
44% 63.3 fps
MRender 61.3
Gravity 50.1
Splatting 51.9
44% 54.4 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LS 120GB-$98
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S9FM02.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 398
Write 71.6
Mixed 81.8
39% 184 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 47.8
4K Mixed 2.88
65% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 25.3
DQ Write 55
DQ Mixed 2.92
13% 27.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
632GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 162
Mixed 159
121% 160 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.38
4K Mixed 0.27
128% 1.32 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer 78.CAGP7.C7Z0B 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.1% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 10
32% 11 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 11.6
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-A/M.2 Builds (Compare 3,164 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H110M-A/M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback