MSI 870A Fuzion (MS-7660)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7660
MotherboardMSI 870A Fuzion (MS-7660)  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 05 '20 at 22:08
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
CPU1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Memory 75.6
1-Core 46.2
2-Core 94
46% 71.9 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 283
29% 236 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Gainward(10B0 11C6) 1GB
CLim: 1006 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Lighting 17.7
Reflection 18.2
Parallax 23.2
14% 19.7 fps
MRender 22.4
Gravity 23
Splatting 17.3
17% 20.9 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 240GB
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 112 68 91 86 61 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.3% Below average
Read 190
Write 108
Mixed 116
SusWrite 86.8
28% 125 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 26.3
4K Mixed 16.3
67% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 17.7
DQ Write 27.2
DQ Mixed 20.1
16% 21.7 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 94%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
316GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 96 99 99 100 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 102
Write 102
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 98.4
67% 91.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-096.A01LF 9905403-096.A01LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
31.4% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 12.1
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 9
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 870A Fuzion (MS-7660) Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI 870A Fuzion (MS-7660)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $361
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback