Dell Studio XPS 9100

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell Studio XPS 9100  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 05DN3X
Memory20.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101021
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateDec 05 '20 at 21:36
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 930-$149
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 76.1
2-Core 146
64% 104 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 372
39% 310 Pts
64-Core 371
23% 371 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5870
AMD(1002 0B00) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
19% Very poor
Lighting 27.6
Reflection 20.7
Parallax 27.8
22% 25.4 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 21.3
Splatting 11.2
12% 15.5 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
FTM1TN325H 1TB
876GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0424A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 221 89 10 7.8 9.4 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.2% Average
Read 207
Write 207
Mixed 197
SusWrite 90.4
39% 175 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 46.8
4K Mixed 18.8
74% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 28.6
57% 112 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 93%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB
398GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 30 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 28.7
Write 29.7
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 29.4
21% 28.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.6
164% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273CH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
52.3% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 19.6
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 9100 Builds (Compare 422 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Dell Studio XPS 9100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $378
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback