Gigabyte GA-Z270-Gaming K3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics58% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270-Gaming K3  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170210
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateDec 05 '20 at 21:25
Run Duration408 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 91
2-Core 223
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 389
53% 394 Pts
64-Core 392
24% 392 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8280
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
6.01% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 6.1
Parallax 7.3
6% 6.7 fps
MRender 7.8
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 10.6
7% 8.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.01%
Great: 7%
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
58% Above average
Lighting 71.7
Reflection 76.9
Parallax 79.3
58% 76 fps
MRender 67
Gravity 73.9
Splatting 68.8
57% 69.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 755 500 708 709 540 827 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 1,992
Write 1,160
Mixed 1,219
SusWrite 673
280% 1,261 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 31
4K Mixed 36.4
135% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 870
DQ Write 42.4
DQ Mixed 134
178% 349 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 182%
Great: 435%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
258GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 232 299 302 243 351 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 438
Write 376
Mixed 342
SusWrite 291
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 29.6
4K Mixed 33.4
119% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 44.3
DQ Mixed 105
104% 178 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 134%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174
250GB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 141 146 144 139 169 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 182
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 149
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.9
212% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 134 148 147 143 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 163
Mixed 93.1
SusWrite 148
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 101%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
808GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 56 57 47 55 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 74
Write 59.4
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 52.8
46% 61.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 67%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174
903GB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 126 126 125 120 143 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 140
Write 133
Mixed 64
SusWrite 128
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
211% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
732GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 128 128 128 128 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 137
Write 119
Mixed 80.1
SusWrite 127
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 101%
SanDisk Cruzer 8GB
4GB free, PID 5406
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 29.4
Write 2.5
Mixed 2.7
9% 11.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 8%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB
906GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 82 79 82 84 96 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 144
Write 106
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 85.1
109% 89.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 53%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68N32N0 4TB
540GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 90 96 95 93 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 111
Write 111
Mixed 90.5
SusWrite 97.1
138% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
113% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 68%
WDC WD30 EZRX-22D8PB0 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 90 96 95 93 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 137
Write 137
Mixed 91.6
SusWrite 97.4
154% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
109% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 54%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68N32N0 4TB
780GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 78 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 101
Write 102
Mixed 88.6
SusWrite 77.4
124% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
106% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 68%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00WN9B0 4TB
177GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 76 78 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 102
Write 102
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 77.2
121% 90.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
95% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$161
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.5% Good
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 19.9
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 19.6
54% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270-Gaming K3 Builds (Compare 2,046 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270-Gaming K3 - $206

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $881
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback