Asrock X399 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X399 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory121.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 05 '20 at 20:40
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1900X-$110
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 60.3
1-Core 117
2-Core 234
73% 137 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 801
76% 628 Pts
64-Core 1,224
76% 1,224 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan Xp
Nvidia(10DE 11DF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2852 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 168
Reflection 180
Parallax 163
137% 170 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 163
Splatting 114
108% 134 fps
Poor: 114%
This bench: 122%
Great: 140%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 546 321 321 305 305 291 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 2,413
Write 1464
Mixed 1,252
SusWrite 348
303% 1,369 MB/s
4K Read 55.8
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 70.5
234% 79.3 MB/s
DQ Read 891
DQ Write 536
DQ Mixed 714
532% 714 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 222%
Great: 280%
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GB-$550
233GB free
Firmware: 8EV10135 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 877 897 954 973 967 962 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 694
Write 946
Mixed 563
SusWrite 938
178% 785 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 51.5
207% 81.6 MB/s
DQ Read 976
DQ Write 627
DQ Mixed 776
586% 793 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 184%
Great: 230%
LSI MR9260-8i 16TB
5TB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 275 272 286 284 292 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 395
Write 276
Mixed 159
SusWrite 271
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 8.5
4K Mixed 1.2
23% 6.9 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 14.5
DQ Mixed 6.1
28% 67 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3000 C16 Series 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 51.5
MC Mixed 42.2
126% 43.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 21.7
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 112%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399 Taichi Builds (Compare 566 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $929
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback