Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_TUF505DU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics65.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DU_TUF505DU  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DU
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191224
Uptime14.1 Days
Run DateDec 05 '20 at 18:57
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User CRI-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 69.5
1-Core 99.9
2-Core 182
66% 117 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 426
48% 380 Pts
64-Core 424
26% 424 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Asus(1043 10AF) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.10.30.04
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
65.2% Good
Lighting 80.1
Reflection 35.7
Parallax 76.3
65% 64 fps
MRender 92.7
Gravity 79
Splatting 70.9
65% 80.9 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 512GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 255 182 178 180 176 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 769
Write 666
Mixed 678
SusWrite 227
131% 585 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 60
201% 71.8 MB/s
DQ Read 844
DQ Write 676
DQ Mixed 832
603% 784 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 141%
Great: 191%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
363GB free
Firmware: SDM4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 127 127 129 128 131 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
57% Above average
Read 69.7
Write 118
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 128
68% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.5
194% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 57%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80% Very good
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 27.5
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 22.9
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DU_TUF505DU Builds (Compare 100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_TUF505DU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback