Acer Aspire A514-52G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.22% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive135% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 76% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire A514-52G  (all builds)
MotherboardCML Sneezy_WC
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200328
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 05 '20 at 16:44
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 14%
CPU Throttled 76%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 66.2
1-Core 79
2-Core 203
63% 116 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 530
55% 441 Pts
64-Core 532
33% 532 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 139C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7463
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
6.22% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 23.5
Parallax 8
6% 12.7 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 10.9
8% 9.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.22%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM512GDJTNG-8310A 512GB
398GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 660 679 552 355 307 280 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 1,034
Write 535
Mixed 419
SusWrite 472
136% 615 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 99.1
4K Mixed 39.9
126% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 577
DQ Write 577
DQ Mixed 558
424% 571 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 135%
Great: 172%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S1KA-4 Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
58% Above average
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 17.7
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 21.6
57% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 58%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A514-52G Builds (Compare 236 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A514-52G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback