Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	7.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	32.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 65% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX504GM
Memory	10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190430
Uptime	2.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 05 '20 at 13:48
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	8%
CPU Throttled	65%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8300H 167,898 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	40.7% Average	Memory 64.2 1-Core 61.6 2-Core 120 49% 82 Pts	4-Core 93.5 8-Core 288 21% 191 Pts	64-Core 253 16% 253 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Asus(1043 1391) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5167 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	7.9% Terrible	Lighting 8.5 Reflection 41.8 Parallax 16.5 7% 22.3 fps	MRender 7.7 Gravity 7.4 Splatting 18.1 10% 11.1 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 7.9% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3256GJ 256GB 2,813 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 94 76 58 54 16 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.1% Below average	Read 202 Write 186 Mixed 240 SusWrite 61.3 39% 172 MB/s	4K Read 8.4 4K Write 20.5 4K Mixed 15.1 43% 14.7 MB/s	DQ Read 124 DQ Write 170 DQ Mixed 133 104% 142 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 79%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 602GB free Firmware: JB0OA3V0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 120 121 122 119 124 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	74% Very good	Read 137 Write 133 Mixed 37.2 SusWrite 121 78% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 859B BLS8G4S26BFSDK.8FBD 16GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2667, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	MC Read 19.8 MC Write 26.2 MC Mixed 18.4 61% 21.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 16.1 SC Mixed 11.6 34% 12 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM Builds (Compare 1,218 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Sail boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Sail boat

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	736x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	482x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	637x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	580x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	1x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 96%, 18,615 samples	218x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	200x
RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 81%, 18,233 samples	172x

RAM
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	234x
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 44%, 33,430 samples	177x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	86x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16