Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics68.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive61.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Pro3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory20.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160531
Uptime21.3 Days
Run DateDec 05 '20 at 11:10
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6120 Six-Core
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 81.3
1-Core 69.4
2-Core 110
55% 87 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 272
30% 237 Pts
64-Core 269
17% 269 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.7% Good
Lighting 91.2
Reflection 80.9
Parallax 74.6
74% 82.2 fps
MRender 64.4
Gravity 77.7
Splatting 69.5
58% 70.5 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 73%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc 2.5 SSD 1TB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1224A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 12 15 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 429
Write 365
Mixed 323
SusWrite 55.4
65% 293 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 65.3
4K Mixed 26.8
110% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 51.2
72% 130 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL10-8GBXL F3-12800CL10-8GBXL Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
36.8% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 12
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 10.7
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 790 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 - $18

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback