Dell Precision T1650

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemDell Precision T1650
MotherboardDell Precision T1650  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130131
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 09 '17 at 14:58
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1225 V2-$248
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 85.4
1-Core 97.4
2-Core 193
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 364
50% 369 Pts
64-Core 371
23% 371 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 8572) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 381.89
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.88% Terrible
Lighting 4.63
Reflection 4.35
Parallax 4.38
4% 4.45 fps
MRender 4.43
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 6.17
4% 4.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.88%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
65% Good
Read 475
Write 233
Mixed 203
66% 304 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 44.1
4K Mixed 18.4
79% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 70.8
DQ Mixed 43.7
67% 134 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65%
Great: 76%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
530GB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 156
Mixed 33.7
90% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 2.79
4K Mixed 0.36
124% 1.31 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 109%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
560GB free, PID b202
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 30.4
Write 23.6
Mixed 26.3
33% 26.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.2
62% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 44%
Seagate Expansion 160GB
112GB free, PID 2312
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 27.1
Write 20
Mixed 18.2
26% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.63
4K Mixed 0.38
70% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391B5273DH0-YK0 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
59.8% Above average
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 18.4
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 18.8
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T1650 Builds (Compare 953 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T1650

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $384
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback