Asus ZenBook UX434IQ_Q407IQ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus ZenBook UX434IQ_Q407IQ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UX434IQ
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '20 at 17:10
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 43.2
1-Core 80.4
2-Core 171
52% 98.3 Pts
4-Core 563
8-Core 788
85% 676 Pts
64-Core 741
46% 741 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX350
Asus(1043 1092) 2GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.40.54
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Lighting 17.7
Reflection 23.7
Parallax 21.4
14% 20.9 fps
MRender 13.2
Gravity 21.2
Splatting 17.2
14% 17.2 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80001C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 362 352 366 367 360 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 663
Write 482
Mixed 355
SusWrite 365
104% 466 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 63.6
4K Mixed 29.7
112% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 504
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 422
309% 409 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 101%
Great: 153%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MT53E512M32D2NP-046 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
79.7% Very good
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 28.5
86% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 34.1
SC Mixed 22.2
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 188
21% 188 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZenBook UX434IQ_Q407IQ Builds (Compare 161 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus ZenBook UX434IQ_Q407IQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback