Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics90.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive41.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180208
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateDec 04 '20 at 17:00
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 70.3
1-Core 110
2-Core 202
71% 128 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 657
61% 509 Pts
64-Core 836
52% 836 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90.5% Outstanding
Lighting 114
Reflection 121
Parallax 116
93% 117 fps
MRender 131
Gravity 97.6
Splatting 92.8
86% 107 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3Z40107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 5.3 5.4 5 150 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 453
Write 394
Mixed 15.3
SusWrite 87.8
52% 237 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 10
4K Mixed 3.7
31% 9.23 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 40.8
82% 158 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
97GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 107 96 109 109 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 98.3
Write 88
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 105
56% 78 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15/8G SP008GBLFU240B02 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.1% Good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 25.8
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 17.5
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,714 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $413
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback