Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	11.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	31.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA (all builds)
Memory	13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20170607
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 04 '20 at 12:51
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8300-$168 49,767 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	66.2% Good	Memory 89.8 1-Core 71.8 2-Core 136 62% 99.1 Pts	4-Core 232 8-Core 412 39% 322 Pts	64-Core 405 25% 405 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7770 38,053 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Gigabyte(1458 2556) 1GB CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.4 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Lighting 14.5 Reflection 18.7 Parallax 25.9 12% 19.7 fps	MRender 14.6 Gravity 15.4 Splatting 13 12% 14.3 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 188GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 139 143 203 148 147 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.4% Below average	Read 240 Write 83 Mixed 76.2 SusWrite 163 31% 141 MB/s	4K Read 9.9 4K Write 17.1 4K Mixed 9.4 36% 12.1 MB/s	DQ Read 11.3 DQ Write 22.8 DQ Mixed 16.4 13% 16.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 100%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 25GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 53 53 54 52 54 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	30% Below average	Read 51.2 Write 50.6 Mixed 38 SusWrite 53 36% 48.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 58%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 376GB free, PID d011 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 91 90 91 90 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	38% Below average	Read 85.9 Write 81 Mixed 46.2 SusWrite 89.8 102% 75.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 2x8GB 9,823 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49.5% Average	MC Read 20.4 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 17.5 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 12.4 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 67.5 59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	51x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	13x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	13x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $588

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16