Huananzhi X99-TF

Performance Results


Gaming 86% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 94% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	201% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Huananzhi X99-TF (all builds)
Motherboard	HUANANZHI X99-TF
Memory	29.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200826
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 04 '20 at 07:26
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 6,301 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	66.1% Good	Memory 79.9 1-Core 92.6 2-Core 181 68% 118 Pts	4-Core 281 8-Core 666 54% 473 Pts	64-Core 1366 84% 1366 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% MSI(1462 3609) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 457.51 Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	122% Outstanding	Lighting 166 Reflection 182 Parallax 190 136% 179 fps	MRender 129 Gravity 175 Splatting 119 114% 141 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$40 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 183GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1466 395 396 399 400 400 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	201% Outstanding	Read 1,885 Write 1,804 Mixed 1,241 SusWrite 576 308% 1,376 MB/s	4K Read 36.3 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 68.2 201% 71.9 MB/s	DQ Read 730 DQ Write 442 DQ Mixed 661 472% 611 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 201% Great: 302%
JetFlash Transcend 8GB 1,070 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 3GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 12 11 12 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	8.21% Terrible	Read 28.6 Write 8 Mixed 7 SusWrite 11.5 15% 13.8 MB/s	4K Read 6.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 24% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.21% Great: 10%
ST925031 5AS 250GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 104GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 72 70 72 70 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	26.1% Poor	Read 49.3 Write 45.8 Mixed 32.9 SusWrite 71.1 68% 49.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB 4x8GB 970 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	96.9% Outstanding	MC Read 41.6 MC Write 39.9 MC Mixed 32.1 108% 37.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 18.1 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 80.8 50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 96.9% Great: 120%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-TF Builds (Compare 331 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Raft

System: Huananzhi X99-TF

CPU
Xeon E5-2678 v3IntelBench 71%, 6,301 samples	202x
Xeon E5-2673 v3IntelBench 70%, 592 samples	17x
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples	16x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	21x
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	19x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	15x

SSD
SA2000M8250G 250GBKingstonBench 171%, 42,173 samples	9x
NE-512 512GBBench 177%, 5,933 samples	6x
NE-256 256GBBench 159%, 6,044 samples	6x

RAM
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 405 samples	12x
Atermiter 4x8GBUnknownBench 94%, 483 samples	8x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 59%, 1,132 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $59

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16