TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive248% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X370-PRO  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170224
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateDec 03 '20 at 16:55
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 68.7
1-Core 101
2-Core 204
69% 125 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 718
67% 559 Pts
64-Core 1,114
69% 1,114 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑
This bench: 71.7%
 Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85B1)
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2122 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Lighting 68.2
Reflection 70.4
Parallax 65.1
56% 67.9 fps
MRender 69.3
Gravity 71.5
Splatting 64
56% 68.3 fps
Poor: 48% ↑
This bench: 55.6%
 Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$157
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1080 939 930 921 912 893 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
248% Outstanding
Read 2,383
Write 2,124
Mixed 1,552
SusWrite 946
391% 1,751 MB/s
4K Read 50.4
4K Write 95.3
4K Mixed 65.3
210% 70.3 MB/s
DQ Read 776
DQ Write 526
DQ Mixed 714
516% 672 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑
This bench: 248%
 Great: 372%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$98
647GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 916 508 509 509 508 509 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 121%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 187 187 186 188 188 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 159
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 186
112% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑
This bench: 106%
 Great: 114%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$7
25GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 45 28 14 15 14 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 148
Write 41
Mixed 49.2
SusWrite 26.4
71% 66 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.8
152% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑
This bench: 34.6%
 Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT8G4D3 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.9% Good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 23.5
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 20.7
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 63% ↑
This bench: 66.9%
 Great: 95%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,549 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD  $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples423x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD  $195Bench 71%, 66,470 samples329x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD  $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples205x
GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples220x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples196x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples190x
SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples95x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung  $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung  $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples75x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples124x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples58x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $647
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback