Lenovo F0CC000QLD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo F0CC000QLD  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Gardenia CRB
Memory6.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161021
Uptime13.2 Days
Run DateDec 03 '20 at 04:31
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-9210 APU (2016 M.SR)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Memory 70
1-Core 25
2-Core 36.3
33% 43.8 Pts
4-Core 28.5
8-Core 28.3
4% 28.4 Pts
64-Core 30.3
2% 30.3 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Legend(17AA 36BE) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.1.1
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 2% Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$23
819GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 23 20 23 32 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 119
Write 92.5
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 33.6
57% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
9.36% Terrible
MC Read 1.2
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 3.6
7% 2.47 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 1.5
5% 1.77 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 9.36%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback