Acer Predator PH315-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Predator PH315-51  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Sienta_CFS
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190327
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateDec 02 '20 at 14:43
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 85.9
1-Core 63.5
2-Core 138
60% 95.7 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 374
39% 306 Pts
64-Core 376
25% 376 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1262) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8935
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
4.64% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 5.9
Parallax 6.8
5% 6.13 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 0
5% 4.17 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.64%
Great: 6%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GJ 128GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 65 60 8.5 58 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 373
Write 332
Mixed 284
SusWrite 74.8
59% 266 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 56.8
4K Mixed 21.2
77% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 192
160% 230 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 78%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
255GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 104 100 105 105 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 100
Write 104
Mixed 28
SusWrite 103
61% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 76%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
737GB free
Firmware: 0706
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 32 35 36 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Read 35.3
Write 26
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 34.3
23% 31.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
116% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 66%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
10GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 2.2 3 3.5 2.9 2.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Write 3.5
Mixed 7.4
SusWrite 2.7
7% 4.53 MB/s
4K Write 1.1
112% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 17%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
43.5% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 11.6
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 12.2
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Predator PH315-51 Builds (Compare 4,746 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-10600K $257Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback