HP p6510f

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive12.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemHP p6510f  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN 2A92
Memory4.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100412
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateMay 08 '17 at 00:53
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 630
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
43.9% Average
Memory 65
1-Core 40
2-Core 78.4
40% 61.1 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 133
18% 133 Pts
64-Core 137
8% 137 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 5400
PwrHis(1787 3000) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1001.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.26% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 2.65
Parallax 1.72
1% 1.92 fps
MRender 2.33
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 2.13
2% 1.78 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.26%
Great: 1%
HP(103C 2A92) 256MB
Driver: atiu9p64 aticfx64 aticfx64 atiu9pag aticfx32 aticfx32 atiumd64 atidxx64 atidxx64 atiumdag atidxx32 atidxx32 atiumdva atiumd6a atitmm64 Ver. 8.702.0.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.49% Terrible
Lighting 0.53
Reflection 1.31
Parallax 0.47
0% 0.77 fps
MRender 0.81
Gravity 0.27
Splatting 1.04
1% 0.71 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.49%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM0
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
12.9% Very poor
Read 39
Write 104
Mixed 44.3
14% 62.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.02
4K Write 11.4
4K Mixed 3.91
14% 5.79 MB/s
DQ Read 4.9
DQ Write 23.8
DQ Mixed 2.63
6% 10.4 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 76%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
86GB free
Firmware: MS1O
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 105
Write 85.1
Mixed 102
74% 97.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.2
67% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA1339.C16F CT51264BA1339.C16F Micron 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F1 Micron 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F1 12GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 8.3
23% 7.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5.8
16% 5.43 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 23%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p6510f Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP p6510f

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback