Acer Swift SF314-41G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Swift SF314-41G  (all builds)
MotherboardPK Strongbow_PK
Memory13.8 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201015
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 01 '20 at 18:52
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 63.8
1-Core 113
2-Core 197
69% 125 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 406
46% 359 Pts
64-Core 404
25% 404 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 540X
Acer(1025 137A) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.26
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
9.97% Terrible
Lighting 11.6
Reflection 20.1
Parallax 15.8
10% 15.8 fps
MRender 10
Gravity 13.2
Splatting 15.8
11% 13 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.97%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 768
Write 621
Mixed 682
154% 691 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 99.5
4K Mixed 57
186% 65.5 MB/s
DQ Read 822
DQ Write 615
DQ Mixed 647
503% 695 MB/s
Poor: 110% Great: 213%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 20GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
53.9% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.7
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 18.3
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Swift SF314-41G Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Swift SF314-41G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $288Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback