Powerspec G158

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive16.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemPowerspec G158  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DP55WG
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110630
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMay 07 '17 at 19:21
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
LGA 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 94.9
1-Core 84.6
2-Core 160
69% 113 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 376
41% 323 Pts
64-Core 377
23% 377 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Lighting 39.2
Reflection 35.8
Parallax 31.6
32% 35.5 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 34.3
Splatting 34.5
29% 35.3 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LS 120GB-$98
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S9FM01.8 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
16.6% Very poor
Read 222
Write 23
Mixed 61.8
22% 102 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 4.62
4K Mixed 0.31
24% 6.21 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
268GB free
Firmware: KC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 109
Write 110
Mixed 92.9
78% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.14
4K Mixed 0.37
91% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x4D33393142353237334348302D4348392020 0x802C 0x31384A53463531323732415A2D3147344431 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.7% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 13
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 13.2
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 57.3
70% 57.3 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G158 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Powerspec G158

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $591
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549WD Black SN850X M.2 4TB $293
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback