Toshiba 6200E13

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba 6200E13  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Intel PCH-LP
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190916
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 01 '20 at 15:57
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100U
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
55.1% Above average
Memory 80.7
1-Core 64.4
2-Core 121
55% 88.6 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 188
24% 179 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Toshiba(1179 0771) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 23.20.16.4901
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
4.2% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 6.5
5% 5.17 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 0.1
3% 3.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.2%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-128G-1010 128GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20170000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 221 218 185 166 158 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
119% Outstanding
Read 824
Write 638
Mixed 710
SusWrite 212
133% 596 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 93.5
4K Mixed 54.1
178% 62.3 MB/s
DQ Read 418
DQ Write 387
DQ Mixed 298
252% 368 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 119%
Great: 134%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
10GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 7.2 1.5 5.7 0 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 40.7
Write 16.5
Mixed 14.6
SusWrite 4.9
21% 19.2 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.1
76% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.1% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 11.1
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 12.8
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback