Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics13.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150409
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 01 '20 at 06:03
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-7400K APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Memory 50.2
1-Core 40.4
2-Core 66.1
33% 52.2 Pts
4-Core 77.1
8-Core 72.1
10% 74.6 Pts
64-Core 64.2
4% 64.2 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Nvidia(10DE 1073) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Lighting 16.6
Reflection 15.9
Parallax 15.7
14% 16.1 fps
MRender 20.6
Gravity 17.4
Splatting 14
14% 17.3 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 103 21 107 4.7 36 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 144
Write 230
Mixed 9.5
SusWrite 80.7
26% 116 MB/s
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 0.4
6% 3.45 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$39
3GB free
Firmware: 02.03E02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 47.6
Write 47.8
Mixed 36.5
33% 44 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 59%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
28GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 172 176 173 173 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 141
Mixed 91.8
SusWrite 171
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
206% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.2% Poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 7.9
20% 7.17 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 6
13% 4.57 GB/s
Latency 160
25% 160 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A88XM-D3H Builds (Compare 332 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $163
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback