Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 35% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	47.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	89.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

System	Gigabyte A320M-S2H V2
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191202
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Nov 30 '20 at 20:14
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104 181,631 User benchmarks, average bench 60% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Memory 77 1-Core 90.2 2-Core 184 67% 117 Pts	4-Core 404 8-Core 398 54% 401 Pts	64-Core 296 18% 296 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.9.1 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	47.8% Average	Lighting 60.6 Reflection 61.6 Parallax 80.4 49% 67.5 fps	MRender 61.2 Gravity 61.7 Splatting 44.9 45% 55.9 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20 61,417 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 118GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900KB3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 424 424 434 286 23 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	89.7% Excellent	Read 432 Write 372 Mixed 344 SusWrite 335 83% 371 MB/s	4K Read 29.5 4K Write 82.6 4K Mixed 36 135% 49.4 MB/s	DQ Read 134 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 136 133% 205 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 717GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 189 188 190 191 190 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 177 Write 134 Mixed 81.3 SusWrite 190 106% 145 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GBF1X08QFHH38-135-K 2x8GB 10,593 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	MC Read 37.9 MC Write 35.9 MC Mixed 36 105% 36.6 GB/s	SC Read 24.2 SC Write 39.8 SC Mixed 28.5 88% 30.8 GB/s	Latency 86.3 46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF Builds (Compare 1,524 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	213x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	190x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	159x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	112x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	98x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	85x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	79x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	41x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	31x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	45x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	32x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	30x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $311

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16