Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	19.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X2 215-$29 4,513 User benchmarks, average bench 38% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	20.6% Poor	Memory 35 1-Core 16.2 2-Core 24.8 18% 25.3 Pts	4-Core 35.3 8-Core 49.6 5% 42.4 Pts	64-Core 33.9 2% 33.9 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9200 1,231 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0462) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	2.65% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 0.1 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.33 fps	MRender 0.5 Gravity 27.7 Splatting 0.5 7% 9.57 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 2.65% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 480GB 16,522 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 264GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM13.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 63 43 65 73 75 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19.8% Very poor	Read 88.4 Write 74.1 Mixed 39.6 SusWrite 65 15% 66.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 13.5 4K Mixed 9.2 27% 9.4 MB/s	DQ Read 85.7 DQ Write 79.8 DQ Mixed 67.3 55% 77.6 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 Kingston ACR128X64D3U1333C9 Kingston ACR256X64D3U1333C9 7GB 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 4096, 1024, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	8.5% Terrible	MC Read 3.5 MC Write 2 MC Mixed 3.3 8% 2.93 GB/s	SC Read 1.3 SC Write 1.8 SC Mixed 0.5 3% 1.2 GB/s	Latency 227 18% 227 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon II X2 215AMD $29Bench 38%, 4,513 samples	4x

GPU
GeForce 315NvidiaBench 2%, 2,008 samples	4x

SSD
0 500GBCt500mx5Bench 92%, 2,476 samples	1x

RAM
M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5673FH0-CH9 Kingston K1N7HK-HYC 8GBSamsungBench 27%, 2 samples	2x
M378B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 35%, 3,211 samples	1x
CT2K51264BD160B CT2K51264BD160B 8GBUnknownBench 28%, 2 samples	1x

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16