PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 83% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision T5610 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision T5610 (all builds) |
Memory | 121.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kolorów |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190911 |
Uptime | 0.6 Days |
Run Date | Nov 30 '20 at 10:32 |
Run Duration | 153 Seconds |
Run User | POL-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
|
57.3%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Asus(1043 85EC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
126%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 257 320 346 313 187 MB/s
|
83%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 76 77 75 76 MB/s
|
44%
Average
|
|||
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
372GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 85 86 87 88 86 MB/s
|
65.6%
Good
|
|||
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
862GB free
Firmware: JA0OA560
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 96 96 97 96 99 MB/s
|
55.4%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMT42GR7AFR4C-RD 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
|
81.3%
Excellent
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v21stBench 58%, 1,402 samples | 67x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2637 v21stBench 73%, 400 samples | 48x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples | 47x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 80x |
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 38x |
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 26x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 25% - Poor | Total price: $94 |