Asus Z97-A-USB31

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z97-A-USB31  (all builds)
Memory16.4 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '20 at 07:29
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 105
2-Core 203
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 350
50% 365 Pts
64-Core 295
18% 295 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
PNY(196E 0984) 2GB
CLim: 1282 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Lighting 31
Reflection 33.5
Parallax 40
25% 34.8 fps
MRender 41.8
Gravity 38.6
Splatting 34
31% 38.1 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OWC Mercury Electra 3G SSD 240GB
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 502ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 105 133 118 132 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 121
Write 178
Mixed 155
SusWrite 128
33% 146 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 76
4K Mixed 33.4
116% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 151
121% 169 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBSR 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBSR Samsung M378B1G73BH0-CK0 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBSR 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.3% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 17.5
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 19.3
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-A-USB31 Builds (Compare 1,489 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-A-USB31

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $648
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback