Dell Precision Tower 7810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive133% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemDell Precision Tower 7810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 7810  (all builds)
Memory55.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201019
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 29 '20 at 23:11
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
41.7% Average
Memory 42.9
1-Core 56.1
2-Core 112
40% 70.4 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 450
39% 334 Pts
64-Core 650
40% 650 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.57
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Lighting 38.9
Reflection 41.4
Parallax 37.6
32% 39.3 fps
MRender 50.7
Gravity 36.7
Splatting 39.2
34% 42.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Seagate BarraCud 500GB
239GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STPSC014 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1483 1518 1534 504 496 459 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 841
Write 1246
Mixed 988
SusWrite 999
231% 1,018 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 35.8
4K Mixed 27.9
91% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 233
171% 226 MB/s
Poor: 100%
This bench: 133%
Great: 277%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A4K40BB2-CTD 2x31.5GB
2 of 8 slots used
63GB RIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.7% Poor
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 9.8
27% 9.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 9.5
22% 7.87 GB/s
Latency 189
21% 189 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 7810 Builds (Compare 1,749 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 7810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Below average Total price: $68
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback