HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory3.8 GB free of 6.00195 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 29 '20 at 18:54
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5660
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 79.1
2-Core 155
66% 109 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 450
48% 380 Pts
64-Core 459
28% 459 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1900 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.3% Below average
Lighting 41.2
Reflection 55.1
Parallax 63.3
34% 53.2 fps
MRender 55.9
Gravity 48.5
Splatting 40.4
39% 48.3 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU635 240GB-$20
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1120A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 173 221 214 19 62 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.2% Poor
Read 221
Write 224
Mixed 215
SusWrite 117
44% 194 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.4
31% 7.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:02 FE EBJ10EE8BAWA-DJ-E ID:02 FE EBJ10EE8BAWA-DJ-E ID:02 FE EBJ10EE8BAWA-DJ-E ID:02 FE EBJ10EE8BAWA-DJ-E ID:02 FE EBJ10EE8BAWA-DJ-E ID:02 FE EBJ10EE8BAWA-DJ-E 40GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 34816 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
51.4% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 20.4
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 12.8
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,348 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $258
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback