Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive65% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 29 '20 at 14:43
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
60.6% Good
Memory 73.1
1-Core 75.6
2-Core 110
54% 86.3 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 442
43% 351 Pts
64-Core 469
29% 469 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 144
Parallax 132
109% 137 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 136
Splatting 120
102% 125 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 143 144 158 126 128 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
65% Good
Read 341
Write 209
Mixed 217
SusWrite 137
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 65
4K Mixed 32.7
116% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 165
123% 160 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 65%
Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ABA200 2TB
978GB free
Firmware: MZ4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 124 124 129 127 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 125
Write 131
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 126
73% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.4
114% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ZEUS-1600 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.5% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 12.9
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 11.3
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 94.4
42% 94.4 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,066 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback