Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 113% UFO	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 103% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-A/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	29.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170113
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 06 '17 at 17:39
Run Duration	259 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	94.2% Outstanding	Memory 92.4 1-Core 129 2-Core 262 90% 161 Pts	4-Core 516 8-Core 838 83% 677 Pts	64-Core 1,030 64% 1,030 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 94.2% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 36FE) CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	Lighting 157 Reflection 158 Parallax 141 128% 152 fps	MRender 125 Gravity 152 Splatting 116 106% 131 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mushkin Chronos 120GB-$70 862 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 75GB free Firmware: 502ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 120 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 2 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 71055938978124 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 620 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 394 (B1) Unknown 0 0 8 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 0 0 234 (BE) vendor-specific 29 48 68722622493 (C2) HDA temperature 29 48 68722622493 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 2 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 9542 (EA) Unknown 0 0 7976 (F1) Unknown 0 0 7976 (F2) Unknown 0 0 5159	51% Above average	Read 200 Write 124 Mixed 135 34% 153 MB/s	4K Read 28.5 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 10.2 114% 49.5 MB/s	DQ Read 28.2 DQ Write 120 DQ Mixed 10 26% 52.9 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 84%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 750GB 895 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	190% Outstanding	Read 1,432 Write 1,157 Mixed 1,289 288% 1,293 MB/s	4K Read 44.3 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 52.4 191% 67.7 MB/s	DQ Read 43.1 DQ Write 106 DQ Mixed 29.6 36% 59.7 MB/s
Poor: 115% ↑ This bench: 190% Great: 351%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 70 (03) Spinup time 178 178 21500592380 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1728 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 126 126 32 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6467 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 305 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1781 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1781 (C2) HDA temperature 214 214 154620002332 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	104% Outstanding	Read 185 Write 176 Mixed 171 134% 177 MB/s	4K Read 0.92 4K Write 2.04 4K Mixed 0.2 98% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 107%
USB2.0 Flash Disk 1GB 306 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 1GB free, PID 3234 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	6.66% Terrible	Read 23.6 Write 8.4 Mixed 12.1 16% 14.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.99 4K Write 0.08 4K Mixed 0.12 25% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 6.66% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 3000 C15 8x4GB 265 User benchmarks, average bench 119% 8 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	110% Outstanding	MC Read 42.4 MC Write 43.3 MC Mixed 40.9 121% 42.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 23.7 SC Mixed 22.1 59% 20.5 GB/s	Latency 63.3 63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 102% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 145%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,297 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	765x
Core i7-5930KIntel $150Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	197x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	92x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	118x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	116x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	109x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	87x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	51x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	40x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	43x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GBCorsair $140Bench 87%, 4,858 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $352

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16