EVGA 131-GT-E767

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardEVGA 131-GT-E767  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1 GHz
Display1842 x 1036 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '20 at 21:51
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3690-$990
Socket 423, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.65 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 92.5
1-Core 95.8
2-Core 190
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 373
8-Core 586
59% 480 Pts
64-Core 709
44% 709 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000
HP(103C 0780) 2GB
CLim: 620 MHz, MLim: 754 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 377.83
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair CMFSSD-1 128GB
74GB free
Firmware: 8C1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 144 162 171 141 172 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 218
Write 105
Mixed 131
SusWrite 152
34% 151 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 9.5
4K Mixed 9.7
52% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 16.7
DQ Write 7.2
DQ Mixed 10.1
8% 11.3 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 51%
WD WD3000HLHX-01JJPV0 300GB
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 131 133 129 131 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 142
Write 127
Mixed 89.5
SusWrite 130
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
71% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 6 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
33.8% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 9.1
32% 11 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 9.5
25% 8.73 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 131-GT-E767 Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: EVGA 131-GT-E767

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $351
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback