Lenovo 90NT0000US

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 90NT0000US  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3708
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200526
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '20 at 21:49
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 85%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
48.8% Average
Memory 66.4
1-Core 93.6
2-Core 184
64% 115 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 180
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 194
12% 194 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 2 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3708) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.20
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
3.82% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 6.4
Parallax 5.2
3% 5.17 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 9
5% 5.77 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.82%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-256G-1001 256GB
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21110001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 177 189 186 194 182 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 1,225
Write 782
Mixed 878
SusWrite 191
171% 769 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 35.6
4K Mixed 27.2
110% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 319
245% 334 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 109%
Great: 184%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (98th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.4% Below average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 12.1
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 11
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90NT0000US Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 90NT0000US

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback