MSI X299 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A90)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive247% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A90
MotherboardMSI X299 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A90)  (all builds)
Memory112.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200601
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '20 at 03:25
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7980XE-$1,200
CPU0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
57.5% Above average
Memory 68.2
1-Core 59.1
2-Core 143
52% 90.1 Pts
4-Core 253
8-Core 448
42% 351 Pts
64-Core 1022
63% 1022 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 95%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 179
Parallax 118
103% 141 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 140
Splatting 109
98% 121 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 101%
Great: 133%
AMD RX 550-$79
Device(7333 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Lighting 15.8
Reflection 26.4
Parallax 20.4
13% 20.9 fps
MRender 25.1
Gravity 15.1
Splatting 20
16% 20.1 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 900P Optane NVMe PCIe 280GB-$160
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E2010480 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1309 1409 1413 1372 1465 1421 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
247% Outstanding
Read 1,631
Write 1,454
Mixed 1,515
SusWrite 1,398
338% 1,500 MB/s
4K Read 75.9
4K Write 70.8
4K Mixed 71.3
244% 72.7 MB/s
DQ Read 554
DQ Write 400
DQ Mixed 474
355% 476 MB/s
Poor: 302%
This bench: 247%
Great: 559%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92
233GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1388 406 407 406 405 406 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1854
Write 1,339
Mixed 1,246
SusWrite 570
279% 1,252 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 71.5
4K Mixed 48.5
156% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 508
DQ Write 369
DQ Mixed 442
329% 440 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 177%
Great: 280%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$61
3TB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 166 168 162 174 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 117
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 165
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 113%
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 16GB
10GB free, PID 556b
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 6.3 5.4 5.5 5.5 4.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 5.5
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 5.8
14% 13.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 2.3
130% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
117% Outstanding
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 64.9
MC Mixed 41.5
138% 48.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 9.4
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 117%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X299 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A90) Builds (Compare 276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X299 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A90)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $903
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback