HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive59.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory21.7 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '20 at 01:22
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5660
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 70.7
2-Core 128
61% 96.9 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 558
50% 420 Pts
64-Core 842
52% 842 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000
HP(103C 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.84
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
6.03% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 12.2
Parallax 6.6
6% 8.63 fps
MRender 9.4
Gravity 7.9
Splatting 7
6% 8.1 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.03%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 179 181 178 179 176 MB/s
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.4% Above average
Read 254
Write 212
Mixed 220
SusWrite 176
48% 215 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 47.8
4K Mixed 28.5
97% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 151
122% 172 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 100%
Kingston SSDNow V300 480GB-$250
119GB free
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 182 183 182 183 187 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 234
Write 220
Mixed 217
SusWrite 179
48% 213 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 16.6
4K Mixed 18.3
63% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 78.6
DQ Mixed 99.7
79% 112 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 65%
128GB 127GB
67GB free
Firmware: O0918B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 206 205 205 205 205 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.1% Above average
Read 258
Write 241
Mixed 216
SusWrite 199
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 42.5
4K Mixed 27.6
91% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 151
123% 173 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 107%
Generic USB Flash Disk 1GB
0GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.4 3.3 3.4 3.3 3.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
2.2% Terrible
Read 5.2
Write 3.2
Mixed 3.5
SusWrite 3.4
5% 3.82 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.2%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:83 0B NT4GC72B4NA1NL-CG ID:80 CE M393B5170EH1-CH9 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:83 0B NT4GC72B4NA1NL-CG ID:80 CE M393B5170EH1-CH9 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 58GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
59.2% Above average
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 26.1
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 6.2
17% 5.87 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,952 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback