Lenovo 20L6S6UE02

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.07% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive83.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 20L6S6UE02  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20L6S6UE02
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200602
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateNov 27 '20 at 17:52
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 71.9
1-Core 108
2-Core 205
72% 128 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 418
46% 364 Pts
64-Core 424
26% 424 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Legend(17AA 225D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8476
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
6.07% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 7.5
Parallax 8.1
6% 7.47 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 9.6
7% 8.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.07%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9TB8W256G1001 256GB
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6106101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 194 191 188 199 210 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 424
Write 241
Mixed 228
SusWrite 198
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 87
4K Mixed 29.2
138% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 254
203% 286 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 0 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
76.3% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 22
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 24.5
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 97.1
41% 97.1 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback