Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X370-PRO  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170330
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '20 at 17:36
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 73.9
1-Core 107
2-Core 215
73% 132 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 685
69% 558 Pts
64-Core 811
50% 811 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 77%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5500-XT-$217
Gigabyte(1458 231A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.7.2
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.1% Above average
Lighting 70.8
Reflection 65.3
Parallax 115
58% 83.6 fps
MRender 53
Gravity 65.4
Splatting 37.7
41% 52 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 110 37 35 4.8 33 MB/s
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.1% Above average
Read 185
Write 92.3
Mixed 156
SusWrite 41.1
26% 119 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 64.8
4K Mixed 32.8
122% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 21.4
64% 136 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
238GB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 94 98 96 97 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 150
Write 123
Mixed 91.7
SusWrite 96.2
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3000C 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.5% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 13.3
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 15
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,554 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $644
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback