TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP ProLiant ML350 Gen9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive241% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP ProLiant ML350 Gen9  (all builds)
MotherboardHP ProLiant ML350 Gen9
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180122
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateNov 26 '20 at 22:58
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
Proc 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 91.7
2-Core 192
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 679
63% 523 Pts
64-Core 1,050
65% 1,050 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑
This bench: 74.8%
 Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 85AB)
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.1% Above average
Lighting 71.1
Reflection 74.5
Parallax 68.6
58% 71.4 fps
MRender 67.5
Gravity 70.4
Splatting 65.8
55% 67.9 fps
Poor: 51% ↑
This bench: 57.1%
 Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
349GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 806 823 770 794 791 792 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 2,315
Write 2,184
Mixed 1693
SusWrite 796
391% 1,747 MB/s
4K Read 54.7
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 71.5
231% 77.9 MB/s
DQ Read 774
DQ Write 472
DQ Mixed 684
493% 643 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑
This bench: 241%
 Great: 355%
Crucial MTFDDAK128MAY-1A 128GB
10GB free
Firmware: M504
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 317
Write 332
Mixed 268
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 33.7
4K Mixed 23.2
76% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 25.2
DQ Write 67.3
DQ Mixed 33.8
29% 42.1 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 98%
WD Elements 500GB
14GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 46 46 46 46 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
22.1% Poor
Read 50.9
Write 50.5
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 46.1
62% 46.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑
This bench: 22.1%
 Great: 41%
WD My Book 1230 2TB
115GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 99 98 99 99 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 103
Write 104
Mixed 79.7
SusWrite 97.7
130% 96.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑
This bench: 43.2%
 Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HP 809083-091 1x31GB
1 of 24 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (86th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.2% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 11.4
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 12.7
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 17% ↑
This bench: 36.2%
 Great: 37%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical ProLiant ML350 Gen9 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProLiant ML350 Gen9

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v31stBench 69%, 414 samples1x
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples1x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples1x
GPU
GeForce GT 720NvidiaBench 4%, 15,510 samples1x
Quadro M5000NvidiaBench 50%, 1,540 samples1x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples1x
SSD
LOGICAL VOLUME 250GBHPBench 71%, 39 samples1x
PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512G-1001 512GBWDCBench 214%, 9,336 samples1x
EX950 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBHP  $126Bench 284%, 5,166 samples1x
RAM
NOT AVAILABLE 1x8GBUNKNOWNBench 31%, 50 samples1x
809081-081 4x16GBHPBench 81%, 6 samples1x
752369-081 6x16GBHPBench 71%, 14 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback