Dell Vostro 200

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemDell Vostro 200  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0CU409
Memory3.8 GB free of 7 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080920
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 26 '20 at 10:30
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E6750
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
40.5% Average
Memory 71.8
1-Core 30.3
2-Core 59.2
38% 53.8 Pts
4-Core 57.4
8-Core 55.4
8% 56.4 Pts
64-Core 60.5
4% 60.5 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RADEON R5 230
Sapphire(174B A01D) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1003
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
1.73% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 2
2% 2.3 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 2
2% 1.97 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.73%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 187 205 197 209 154 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.7% Above average
Read 203
Write 221
Mixed 198
SusWrite 190
46% 203 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 50.2
4K Mixed 25.7
92% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 25
DQ Write 82
DQ Mixed 35.8
32% 47.6 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 95%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
836GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 149 157 152 160 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 161
Mixed 82.7
SusWrite 155
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
790GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 134 147 139 148 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 171
Mixed 90.6
SusWrite 145
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
248% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 7GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 1024 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 4.9
14% 5.07 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 5.2
13% 4.57 GB/s
Latency 97.4
41% 97.4 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Vostro 200 Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Vostro 200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $205
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback