HP Z620 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z620 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158A
Memory91.5 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191029
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateNov 25 '20 at 22:42
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 71.7
1-Core 78
2-Core 172
61% 107 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 619
57% 478 Pts
64-Core 1,611
100% 1,611 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K600
HP(103C 094B) 1GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.45% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 4.6
3% 4.67 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 4.7
4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.45%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SHGS31-1000GS-2 1TB
852GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 90000Q00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 415 393 401 392 385 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Read 413
Write 312
Mixed 372
SusWrite 403
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 38.1
4K Mixed 27.7
88% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 339
254% 338 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT42GR7BMR4A-G7 6x16GB
6 of 12 slots used
96GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
67.2% Good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 24.1
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 6.3
24% 8.33 GB/s
Latency 97.6
41% 97.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,420 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP Z620 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $345
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback