Lenovo 20217

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Lenovo 20217 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO VIQY0Y1
Memory	14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130918
Uptime	4 Days
Run Date	May 04 '17 at 23:02
Run Duration	86 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209 69,603 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Memory 93.7 1-Core 98.6 2-Core 193 76% 129 Pts	4-Core 272 8-Core 379 41% 325 Pts	64-Core 379 24% 379 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 755M 3,890 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Legend(17AA 3800) 2GB CLim: 1097 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.54 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Lighting 20.5 Reflection 9.35 Parallax 12.2 17% 14 fps	MRender 13.9 Gravity 12.2 Splatting 13.9 11% 13.3 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 14%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 369GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1121 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 658 (B1) Unknown 99 99 11 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 59 48 41 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 70 (F1) Unknown 99 99 12629261119	105% Outstanding	Read 505 Write 391 Mixed 417 97% 438 MB/s	4K Read 40.3 4K Write 73.7 4K Mixed 43 155% 52.3 MB/s	DQ Read 337 DQ Write 233 DQ Mixed 117 133% 229 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GB 30,591 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	MC Read 22.1 MC Write 21.7 MC Mixed 17.3 58% 20.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 13.3 SC Mixed 19.2 44% 15.4 GB/s	Latency 60.6 66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 20217 Builds (Compare 1,125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20217

CPU
Core i7-4700MQIntel $209Bench 59%, 69,603 samples	1,000x
Core i5-4200MIntel $39Bench 50%, 33,019 samples	99x
Core i7-4702MQIntelBench 61%, 21,618 samples	14x

GPU
GeForce GT 755MNvidiaBench 9%, 3,890 samples	455x
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	450x
GeForce GT 750MNvidiaBench 8%, 13,088 samples	218x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	27x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	26x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	25x

RAM
RMT3170EB68F9W1600 2x4GBRamaxelBench 50%, 5,069 samples	174x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 22,647 samples	71x
HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 51%, 18,309 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $284

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16