Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	79.7% Very good	Memory 84.8 1-Core 117 2-Core 220 80% 141 Pts	4-Core 402 8-Core 644 64% 523 Pts	64-Core 626 39% 626 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 8694) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	4.83% Terrible	Lighting 6.5 Reflection 39.8 Parallax 7.6 5% 18 fps	MRender 9.7 Gravity 6.8 Splatting 0.1 4% 5.53 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.83% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71B1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 6.3 25 49 38 5.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	45.7% Average	Read 437 Write 276 Mixed 306 SusWrite 43.6 59% 266 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 62 4K Mixed 0.9 75% 30.1 MB/s	DQ Read 228 DQ Write 13.1 DQ Mixed 22.9 41% 88.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905678-014.A00G 2x8GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.7% Very good	MC Read 27.3 MC Write 28.2 MC Mixed 24.1 76% 26.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 26.9 SC Mixed 19.4 59% 20.6 GB/s	Latency 72.1 56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 89%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	854x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	480x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	372x

RAM
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	113x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	81x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	67x

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $157